I am truly staggered by the impeccable logic and flawless analytical acumen demonstrated by your post. You can't see the line of scrimmage on the field. In the second half, New England almost completely abandoned its running game and relied on Brady's passing. The rule works; people have a hard time with it because they want to think the 2001 game was ruined by it. Mike Pereira: Time to create an unneccesary headline and go against everything I have ever said when working in the NFL so Fox can pimp me some more. this way its absolutely fair for both teams (given that you can agree that his arm was going forward).. To me problem solved, its intentional grounding. Before you go spitting your bs about roughing the passer not being called, how about watching the replay again and again and again. Brady then completed a seven-yard pass to Kevin Faulk before scrambling for five yards and running out of bounds to the Patriots' sideline, picking up a first down at the Oakland 42. Brady, who recently announced his retirement, is now a seven-time Super Bowl champion who . raidernationbaby says: The tuck rule was called in Week 2 of an NFL regular season matchup on September 23, 2001, between the New England Patriots and the New York Jets. Why? Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. On Wednesday, N.F.L. As a Patriots fan, I also support a rule change. How about simplifying the rules regarding a catch while they are at it. Oakland kneels on the ball and kills the clock. Mike Pereira, the former director of officiating of the NFL, noted that the design of the rule avoids the question of the quarterback's intention,[1] except that the referee still must judge whether the initial forward movement of the arm was "intentional". As a Patriots fan, I always thought it was a bad rule and wished it were changed, but I also want the refs to follow the rules rather than making stuff up to call. 2004-2023 CBS Interactive. If you watch the replay of Cassels arm (or Bradys for that matter) you can clearly see that his arm is moving forward when he loses possession. Anyway, the Raiders scored a TD, beat the Patriots and went on to win the Super Bowl. Brought into the game in 1999, the 'tuck rule' was controversial from the very beginning. I was young and didn't watch football at the time. I don't understand the denial around this by pats fans, you got a bullshit call go your way, it happens, but you deny it and even call it the game the fucking "snow bowl" while the entire NFL calls it the tuck rule game. This is consistent with most NFL rules as the league tries to make as many rules applications as possible a simple black-white decision (think helmet-to-helmet contact). The Jets tied the game with a field goal on that drive before going on to win 10-3. Referees initially called the play a fumble and awarded the Redskins a safety, but after instant-replay review cited the tuck rule in reversing the decision and calling it an incomplete pass. It applied if the quarterback moved his arm forward in a passing motion, but then changed his mind and tried to keep hold of the football rather than attempt a pass. poorpathaters says: I have a very simple solution to this absurd rule: When the defender hits the QB, if the ball hits the ground behind the line of scrimmage it's a fumble. That was the last great Rams team, not matter how their season ended. So in your opinion that 2nd down and 10 really sealed the game for the Pats even though it didnt create a score, and the Pats still trailed at that point in the game. While they were slightly out of field goal range, Brady dropped back to pass and dropped the ball after being hit by Woodson. In week 2 of the NFL season in 2001. Three plays later, Antowain Smith picked up eight yards for a first down at the Oakland 9 and the Patriots, now going against the wind, fought to set up the game-winning kick. I love how people act like the Pats won against the Raiders only because of the tuck rule. This rule is fine, its only the whining fans of teams that are unable to do their jobs well enough to win that want this rule changed. Gruden was dismissive of Davis' views on the matter, and the subsequent breakdown in relations between owner and coach led to Gruden being traded to Tampa Bay and becoming their head coach in 2002. ", The Raiders responded to the video on Twitter, saying, "Knew it.". But that aint what this is Einstein this is an ACCEPTED AND ESTABLISHED RULE that was PROPERLY APPLIED. . The Tuck Rule has changed the careers of Tom Brady and Bill Belichick forever . Brady's Buccaneers went 13-4 this season but were knocked out of the playoffs in the Divisional round by the now Super Bowl-bound Rams. But on replay, Carey said it was an incomplete pass because of the tuck rule. [13] The Pittsburgh Steelers voted against abolition, while two teams, the Patriots and Redskins, abstained from the vote. Plain and simple. Im sure its no consolation to the many Raiders fans around the country. "[11], The Raiders complained extensively that the call was wrong, and that it was made against them because the league had a vendetta against the team, an attitude Oakland quarterback Rich Gannon said was "totally nonsense. I still say he had a personal stake in a Raider victory. It should have been inconclusive. The rule was properly applied, period. An incomplete pass stops the clock and prevents the loss of yards from a sack. It was 2001. Here's the thing. Both teams struggled in the heavy snowstorm during the first half, combining for the same number of punts as first downs (11) and converting only one of 13 third downs. Tucker makes the case that there is a war against Christians happening in America on 'Tucker Carlson Tonight:' TUCKER CARLSON: You always imagine in your mind's eye that it's evil men who destroy . 4 Reply Jamie_Naughright The call against the Raiders was not the tuck rule. After NFL owners voted 29-1 to repeal the controversial Tuck Rule at the annual meeting in Phoenix on Wednesday, it is no longer in effect. Really? Repeat three to five times. There should also be some kind of rule that stops the Patriots from acquiring draft picks in one year, that turn out to be better the next. And as for this clown harrisonhits2 says: Jan 11, 2011 12:11 PM. ", "10 highlights from Jon Gruden's Raiders news conference, including 'Tom Brady fumbled' Reference", https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tuck_Rule_Game&oldid=1142353824, Sports competitions in Foxborough, Massachusetts, January 2002 sports events in the United States, 21st century in Foxborough, Massachusetts, All Wikipedia articles written in American English, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 3.0, This page was last edited on 1 March 2023, at 23:18. The Tuck Rule states, "When [an offensive] player is holding the ball to pass it forward, any intentional forward movement of his arm starts a forward pass, even if the player loses possession of the ball as he is attempting to tuck it back toward his body.". he is no longer in the act of throwing. Tuck rule or not the raiders got robbed. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. By accepting all cookies, you agree to our use of cookies to deliver and maintain our services and site, improve the quality of Reddit, personalize Reddit content and advertising, and measure the effectiveness of advertising. It was one of the worst calls in the history of sports. Patriots kicker Adam Vinatieri later tied the game with a 45-yard field goal; in overtime, the Patriots defeated the Raiders on another field goal. Well start with Brady. That is not a tucking motion That is already tucked. Unless the Raiders won a Super Bowl that season, he was going to Tampa. It was the right call. [1] Broncos quarterback Jake Plummer lost the football while in the Broncos' own end zone. Instead of 4th and long with a little more than a minute remaining, it became first and goal. Bradys was a fumble. And in Oakland, does Jon Gruden stick around instead of getting traded to Tampa Bay and wining a Super Bowl there? Not a member? "The tuck rule was called in Week 2 of an NFL regular season matchup on September 23, 2001, between the New England Patriots and the New York Jets. With the tuck rule the entire motion is covered, so there is no room for the ref to screw it up as a judgement call. A source told Ian Rapoport on Wednesday that the elimination of the "Tuck Rule" passed overwhelmingly at the NFL Annual Meeting in Phoenix. Please explain Einstein how you can have an incomplete pass without first throwing the football? Brady himself admitted that if it weren't for the ruling, which was abolished in 2014 - today, if a player motions for a forward pass and loses possession, it is ruled a fumble - he would have. His arm was going forward, he saw the pressure and tried to pull it back and take the hit. Pereira sucks everytime he says how a challenge will go the ref comes out and does something completely different I dont care for that guy, WELL SAID theandy59 Im age 52 and watched that game myself Then the refs had the gall to add two unsportsman penalties, putting the ball on the five yard line, when in fact the game should have been over. I love how people give the raiders so much attention. [9], Raiders vs. Patriots ("Tuck Rule Game") (2001), Last edited on 27 December 2022, at 03:51, AFC divisional playoff game on January 19, 2002, "New York Jets at New England Patriots September 23rd, 2001", "Crookdnose's Favorite Football Memory: The Snow Bowl", "Bell: NFL Can Finally Tuck Away Horrible Rule", "2016 Official Playing Rules of the National Football League", https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tuck_rule_(American_football)&oldid=1129789094, This page was last edited on 27 December 2022, at 03:51. This is Bill Belichick were talking about; how many high-priced veterans have we seen him cast away from New England? Since then, the match has been known as the 'Tuck Rule Game'. The end of Tom Brady's long career arrived Tuesday as the seven-time Super Bowl champion announced his retirement from the NFL after 22 years. When discussing Tom Brady and the "Tuck Rule," Ray Lewis was referring to the game-changing call made by the referee during the 2001 AFC divisional playoff game between the New England Patriots and the Oakland Raiders. Of course, I think downing the football to save the clock should also be ruled intentional grounding, since it is exactly what is taking place. The Raiders appeared to be dominating to this point of the game. For that matter, neither do most sports writers. (Of course raiders sold the most merchandise back then and where a very popular team ..the league was not about to put NE in the superbowl they would have lost $$$ at the time).

Mech Arena Club 5000 A Coins, Macquarie Group Salary Sydney, Hogan Lovells Nq Salary London, Articles H