You want grief? What the public fails to realize is that video games are big stress relievers for a lot of folk, myself included. Anyone who plays Saints Row or GTA would REALLY be in trouble. Founded by Frank Galli in 2000, Snipers Hide has been offering informational videos, podcasts, and other support to its users in one location. Yes that will make games soooo much more enjoyable by inserting nagging fucking lawyers. Should gamers be accountable for in-game war crimes Meanwhile Gta players meme from Gamer Memes Download - MemeZila.com 2022 Friday Good Morning Good Night Back to Home Gamer Memes Just by the name alone people said it was a bully simulator. You will not believe how many times I tell to random dudes. Yeeeeah, I'm doomed if they manage to do anything with this. "Putin's shelling of Europe's largest nuclear plant takes his reign of . In a BBC news report earlier this week, however, Francois Senechaud from the International Committee of the Red Cross told a reporter that, due to the increasing verisimilitude between first-person shooters and real-life combat, games should start to abide by the international laws of armed conflict. Besides, 'realism' in cases such as this would likely amount to pushing particularly political agendas. When I read the thread title, I was thinking this was a play of words on match gamers. Instead, the Committee hopes the consequences it requests will halt the potential "trivialization" of war crimes. What would be the fun in games if we couldn't massacre civillians? tl;dr all the posts, can't be assed to detail a response to this besides: Have fun watching your game sales tank (HAH?) As if the loss of 7 billion people due to genocide was just a footnote. Though now that i stop to think about it, is modern war anything other than it twitched shoot it? The ICRC is concerned that certain game scenarios could lead to a trivialization of serious violations of the law of armed conflict, they added. Should gamers be accountable in-game war crimes? Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. Posted October 7, 2013 And it probably helps explain just how . Anti-war activists battle to get their voices heard in WW1 centenary events War crimes in video games should be punished, ICRC says , The Red Cross has told the BBC that it wants military-themed video games to adhere to real-life international laws. Is this feasible? AllAmericanNegr0 8 oct 2021. Fun fact: we deliver faster than Amazon. Gamers should be rewarded for respecting the law of armed conflict and there should be virtual penalties for serious violations of the law of armed conflict, in other words war crimes. [History] Keith Stuart / The Guardian - "Should gamers be accountable for in-game war crimes?" (2013) KotakuInAction Original. The fear is that eventually such illegal acts will be perceived as acceptable behavior., Bernard Barrett, a spokesman for the organization said they were not trying to censor games or spoil peoples fun, but rather, make clear that there are rules in battle and that certain acts are illegal.. You can war dec any PC corp for any reason, keep the war going for as long as you want, suicide gank every one of their toons when they leave for NPC corps and it still aint griefing. This'. "It's difficult to make out the difference between real footage and the footage you get from video games.". this was a few nights ago, took forever to upload after the capture. Killing civilians gets points deducted or what-have-you, while shooting the baddies progresses the game or gets you points. I don't think anyone would appreciate someone saying that about us based on a headline. Of course, this was really more about mechanics than ethics: players were being tested on their reactions and visual awareness, and failure meant a reduction in game time rather than a few moments' reflection on innocent victims. Secretary of State Antony Blinken said Sunday the U.S. sees evidence of war crimes by Russia in Ukraine, adding to mounting accusations against Russia as the International Criminal Court opens its . Gamers should be rewarded for respecting the law of armed conflict and there should be virtual penalties for serious violations of the law of armed conflict, in other words war crimes. Ace Combat players: #should #gamers #accountable #game #war #ace #combat. If they actually played the game they'd see that the point of the game is beating the bullies. With arcade or semi-arcade style games (Call of Duty and Battlefield respectively), it isn't suitable, sure it's a pipe dream. There's also a robotic empire where you can set it so it can't negotiate with organic species and only robotic ones, 'determined exterminator' it only wants to destroy organics. How dare any news organisation report something that people don't want to hear. Should Gamers be accountable for in-game war crimes? I shot my team mate in the ass in Arma III and ran over all the civilians in the first grand theft auto. Same thing sorta happened with Bully. It may not display this or other websites correctly. There should be no responsibility or games would get boring, we play them to escape responsibility. 99% of the possible targets on the field were in fact baddies and had the free to kill on them. The way we learn little snippets about the lives of the characters passing through our border gates in Papers, Please. IFunny Brazil is fun of your life. And Red Cross says they don't want to ruin anyone's fun; they just want "realistic" war games to address the same political and social consequences of real wars. #should #gamers #accountable #game #war #persona #sie. Your anaconda definitely wants some. "It is a war crime to attack a nuclear power plant," the embassy said on its official Twitter feed on March 4. Please check out our wiki page, where we post template albums of popular media! The best of TommyKay clips and funny moments in one place. Same. We are not talking about censorship or banning anything, he added. Need for speed players Blade and sorcery players . We would like to see the law of armed conflict integrated into the games so that players have a realistic experience and deal first-hand with the dilemmas facing real combatants on real battlefields. Back to Home Gamer Memes. Anthony Dworkin, a war crimes expert and senior policy fellow at the European Council on Foreign Relations in London, said Putin's actions in Ukraine follow a consistent pattern dating back to . I doubt fantasy games cross their vision. IE 11 is not supported. Titles like Fable, Heavy Rain, Walking Dead and Dishonored all provide different paths for a player depending on their moral decisions during play and because the action is combined with a confirming narrative element, the meaning and weight of transgression can come through. Or is it only bad if someone mods it so that it takes place in the Middle East instead of NYC? Ohh man. and our The ICRC says sanitizing video games is not realistic. For more information, please see our Players need to be able to live with the consequences of actions in more subtle ways. Success means blending in with the terror squad, and it's up to the player to decide whether that extends as far as shooting civilians. F FlyToAllWorld New Member Jun 13, 2013 40 Oct 17, 2013 #7 What about God of war players. For the purpose of this Statute, crime against humanity means any of the following acts when committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack directed against any civilian population, with knowledge of the attack: Deportation or forcible transfer of population. The people in the world who are committing the majority of the war crimes, have also never even seen a gaming unit, and a Red Cross is nothing more than an aiming reference and resupply point. No Votes: 18 94.7% Other Votes: . As for war crime laws themselves they aren't working terribly well, if the Bush years taught us anything, but that probably a rant for another day. Just that their warcrimes have consequences. There's no reason in debating/arguing this, it just shouldn't be the issue. If I knew I'd get a dishonorable discharge for murdering civilians, I would make extra sure not to do it, instead of callously blowing away everything in front of me. gamers are sub-human. By accepting all cookies, you agree to our use of cookies to deliver and maintain our services and site, improve the quality of Reddit, personalize Reddit content and advertising, and measure the effectiveness of advertising. I read an article like this in a PC Gamer or Game Informer some months ago, but they seemed to be really focused on real-to-life war games, like Call of Duty and the like. Gamers should be rewarded for respecting the law of armed. Its just making it more realistic, the same way the military has rules on the battlefield, then gamers have the same rules., While concern over the influence of violence in video games is shared by many, researchers have not established a definitive link. ), Torture, holding hostages, suicide (assist), terrorism, illegal experiments, assaulting minors (technically not in mc but through it), and more i just cant remember how many life sentences is this worth? "We're not trying to make games boring or preachy, but were hoping that the ones that offer a realistic portrayal of a modern battlefield can incorporate some sort of reward or penalties depending on whether they follow the basic rules of armed conflict. At least I don't play real world war games. Barrett explained that the ICRC were already working with production companies to incorporate these rules into games and others who they had not contacted, had also incorporated some of them into their products. It stopped short of clarifying quite what these consequences should be, suggesting only that "game scenarios should not reward players for actions that in real life would be considered war crimes." How do you move beyond the simple message, "Mission failed, you have broken international law and will spend the next ten years in prison. Via CNET | Source International Committee of the Red Cross. Pages (2): . Memedroid: the best site to see, rate and share funny memes! Just that Call of Duty-esque games, which are realistic representations of modern conflicts should address the fact their are consequences for your actions. And as said aboveif you're playing COD: Black Ops (or any game) on zombie mode, there are no laws. We would like to see the law of armed conflict integrated into the games so that players have a realistic experience and deal first-hand with the dilemmas facing real combatants on real battlefields. I thought that was the whole reasoning behind online gaming tears are just so sweet . Gamers should be rewarded for respecting the law of armed conflict and there should be virtual penalties for serious violations of the law of armed conflict, in other words war crimes. Both Conservatives and Liberals act like such fucking cunts when it comes to violent video games. I don't think this was about introducing more reality to games, that was just the most convincing excuse they could conjure up. What do you call a character that stands still! AlternativeOk1808 4 days ago Lemme see my list 12/2019 - 11/20212 roky. Reddit and its partners use cookies and similar technologies to provide you with a better experience. What about the few people that 100% the entire CoD series? Activision, the producers of the video game Call of Duty, and Rockstar, the producers of Grand Theft Auto, did not respond to a request for comment by NBC News at the time this article was published. April 13, 2022 at 5:01 a.m. If governments aren't being held accountable for war crimes anymore, why should people playing video games? If courts were to punish you for virtual crimes, it should be their responsibility to say what you can and what you can't do in the game yet people are charged for crimes in the . Lol. Having more of these games with varied missions, rules/laws you have to abide by, etc. Ark players. If you look at the Guardian article, Red Cross is suggesting that videogames be more realistic and have in-game consequences for committing war crimes: The ICRC is suggesting that as in real life, these games should include virtual consequences for people's actions and decisions. By rejecting non-essential cookies, Reddit may still use certain cookies to ensure the proper functionality of our platform. Honestly, if they added this to it and worked it into the game properly, I might actually have more interest in playing an FPS. What do you call a character that runs? So I take out a Tristan vs his Thorax and we begin. AAA Hard Surface integrator for Characters, Concept artist and Asset artist responsible for: - military enemy characters. We are, though, surely heading into an era where gamers will have to take greater responsibility for their actions if only because the visual fidelity will be there to splatter our violent failings across the screen in HD detail. Though this kind of makes me think of a bunch of 10-year-olds running around in the deserts of the Middle East, screaming long lines of cuss words at each other while shooting anything that moves. TheInternational Committee of the Red Cross has confirmed that itwon't prosecute gamers for participating in pretend war crimes, but that doesn't mean it wants to leave the topic alone. A series of international statutes, conventions and norms have developed and identify a range of violations related to armed conflict. Plenty of warfare though. Nothing happened in 20w09a but they deserved it. Hybbridd 3 feb 2022. Ad Bot. The amount of people I've killed in horrible, horrible ways in the Prototype series alone will have me locked away for a very long time. A Q&A document posted on the organization's website. Shooting civilians, torture, attacking ambulances and killing prisoners are all aspects in video games that they want to address, he explained. Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2: shootouts often occur in areas where civilians are in the line of fire. Although actually, it's more interesting than that, because the first shot fired sends the group fleeing something the player won't know until they commit to pulling the trigger. Talk about a victimless crime. We would like to see the law of armed conflict integrated into the games so that players have a realistic experience and deal first-hand with the dilemmas facing real combatants on real battlefields. shoot civilian, fail mission the player will usually read these instances in ludic terms. Yes he is, whats going on? You will not believe how many times I tell to random dudes. Skyrim - Civil War Cyrodiil - No emperor. The ICRC's Franois Snchaud justified his organisation's request for consequences, saying "it's very difficult to make the distinction between real footage and the footage you can get from video games." I just wanted the Sudetenland. No, being a gamer should make you exempt from punishments for war crimes committed IRL. In Modern Warfare 2's notorious No Russian mission a US soldier is embedded with a Russian terrorist organisation and must take part in a mass killing at an airport. By accepting all cookies, you agree to our use of cookies to deliver and maintain our services and site, improve the quality of Reddit, personalize Reddit content and advertising, and measure the effectiveness of advertising. And vitally, those who point their gun in the air before firing get the same dispersal effect without casualties. Really!? W2RhdGEtdG9vbHNldC1ibG9ja3MtZmllbGRzLWFuZC10ZXh0PSJmNWNlOGM4OGFiOTUxNGIxZTJkMTgzMTYwOTZjN2Y5YyJdIHsgZm9udC1zaXplOiAxNHB4O2xpbmUtaGVpZ2h0OiAxLjJlbTsgfSBbZGF0YS10b29sc2V0LWJsb2Nrcy1maWVsZHMtYW5kLXRleHQ9ImY1Y2U4Yzg4YWI5NTE0YjFlMmQxODMxNjA5NmM3ZjljIl0gcCB7IGZvbnQtc2l6ZTogMTRweDtsaW5lLWhlaWdodDogMS4yZW07IH0g, The military in education & youth activities, Resources to use with political representatives, Anti-war activists battle to get their voices heard in WW1 centenary events, War crimes in video games should be punished, ICRC says, A Q&A document posted on the organisations website, Militarisation in everyday life in the UK: a conference report, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. Quit trying to run with 'video games teach kids violence', and blame bad parenting and lack of accountability in this day and age. 3 comment. I don't think Prototype would count under "realistic war game", (PS, that's a cool raccoon drawing. Images, GIFs and videos featured seven times a day. What the Red Cross wants to see then is the player being penalised for carrying out such actions as willfully killing civilians or torturing enemy combatants, both of which are punishable under international law. I sure do love the smell of executed and wounded Germans in the cold streets of Stalingrad. I dunno, it just frustrates me that people keep poking s**t when there is obviously nothing wrong with it. warp scramble them for 8 hours sometime, that's grief. F'm and feed'm fish heads. We also have an Instagram page, where memes & templates are posted daily! These days, if you accidentally (or otherwise) shoot a civilian or comrade in a military shooter, youll probably get a mission failed message and a one-way trip back to the last checkpoint. What you wont get is a military tribunal and a dishonorable discharge. Most civilized countries have laws regarding war crimes that are very specific and quite frankly - whomever thought this up has no concept of reality. (Read 1802 times) Epicduke. There have been two stand-out examples. It is also only suggesting this for games that represent realistic military situations. 1. Intentionally targeting civilians or civilian buildings is also considered a war crime under international humanitarian law. i play universe sandbox 2 and dbfz so. You are using an out of date browser. :dazed: Funny, how I read it was someone from the Red Cross saying "I think realistic military simulators should include realistic military consequences for realistic military crimes.". Ukraine, the U.S and its allies accuse Russian forces of targeting civilians indiscriminately, but Russia has consistently denied doing so. By Thread starter Spawn; Start date Oct 5, 2013; Menu . If you look at the Guardian article, Red Cross is suggesting that videogames be more realistic and have in-game consequences for committing war crimes: And Red Cross says they don't want to ruin anyone's fun; they just want "realistic" war games to address the same political and social consequences of real wars. . It's a game, nothing "real, or realistic" about it. Next thing you know, the Red Cross will want to require psych evals for people that have thoughts contrary to their rules. After reading what counts as one online, and not counting repeat offences, becase for most it is more than once, and in many cases more than I would be able remember, here is a list of ingame warcrimes I have commited because I am bored; Grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, namely, any of the following acts against persons or property protected under the provisions of the relevant Geneva Convention: Torture or inhuman treatment, including biological experiments; Wilfully causing great suffering, or serious injury to body or health; Extensive destruction and appropriation of property, not justified by military necessity and carried out unlawfully and wantonly. War crimes in video games should be punished, ICRC says Oct. 3, 2013, 12:16 AM PDT By Henry Austin, NBC News contributor The International Committee of the Red Cross have called for video. purdu_2016 12 oct 2021. A Q&A document posted on the organisation's website explains: The ICRC is suggesting that as in real life, these games should include virtual consequences for people's actions and decisions. His claim may be valid: in 2011, British broadcaster ITVused footage from video gameArma II to illustrate purported paramilitary action. The world must hold Vladimir Putin and his inner circle accountable for international crimes war crimes, crimes against humanity, and the crime of aggression . Dont shoot the civilians. By rejecting non-essential cookies, Reddit may still use certain cookies to ensure the proper functionality of our platform. *snort* I would love to see them try to arrest and charge that many people smfh, its a fake world, full of fake people, me and the boys on our way to the execution chamber. The game may be over but the choices remain and by ending chapter of Waking Dead with a guide to the actions of other players, developer Telltale Games cleverly addresses and confronts the process. April 22, 2020, 10:40:49 PM. The corporate nature of the F1 world dictates that, in any game depicting it, every sponsor's logo, advertising hoarding and so on has to be authentic, which is why it's physically impossible for. Reddit and its partners use cookies and similar technologies to provide you with a better experience. Yes gamers should be held responsible. Arma II's developer Bohemia Interactive is the first game-maker to pledge their support to the ICRC's initiative. The only way I could see games getting more realistic in this type of respect would be to add a sort of PoW feature instead of just busting in a room and killing all the bag guys without any option for them to surrender. Video games, while violent and often depicting death, do not result in the real world equivalent of dead people. The question is, how feasible are the ICRC's aims and will players really take on board the lessons about humanitarian law? If you are having trouble subscribing with this form, try the version here. Though I actually play pretty nice. Should actors be accountable for a murder in their movie? 03/10/2013 Guardian Games Blog The Red Cross has told the BBC that it wants military-themed video games to adhere to real-life international laws Don't shoot the civilians. All Rights Reserved, By submitting your email, you agree to our. Let's start by taking back our Language! Should Gamers be penalised for carrying out unlawful acts in a Video Game? The enemy! It "sort of" exists already in some effect. ItsTickleTipson 5 feb 2022. It wants developers to say, in this mission you must fly an armed drone over a school where terrorists are known to be hiding, and you must decide whether to open fire. High Rock - Geographically cutoff from the rest of the empire. It essentially boils down to "shoot" and "don't shoot" targets like in the arcade shooters. Ohh man. Hm, tempting. LeCard's example of enemies looking to surrender, having to subdue them, handcuff them, handle that aspect of the mission instead of just "er mah gerd shert shert shert them all, keep sherting til they're all deeeerd!". People aren't held accountable for war crimes in real life too tbh. See our privacy policy for more information. I can neither confirm nor deny the building of Auschwitz in minecraft. It is difficult to imagine a Call of Duty or Battlefield title in which shooting a civilian leads to a mission where the player is detained in a military prison for several months before being tried and sentenced. - player abilities. The way that mobile phone hacking lets us see into the personal problems of potential targets in Watch Dogs. I imagine that while the Red Cross has their heart in the right place, most people find this idea to be absurd. Seems like a reasonable suggestion to improve the quality of videogames, if you ask me, but I like fiction that deals with consequences of war with ambiguity and complexity. It's still dumb. Seems like a reasonable suggestion to improve the quality of videogames, if you ask me, but I like fiction that deals with consequences of war with ambiguity and complexity. Furthermore, the ICRC statement makes clear that it is not interested in other genres it is concentrating on combat games that depict and concentrate on contemporary battlefields. Cookie Notice Realism is good, yes, but to an extent. Keith Stuart: The Red Cross has told the BBC that it wants military-themed video games to adhere to real-life international laws, punishing player characters for war crimes. In the video above, Bohemia's CEO Marek Spanel describes how Arma III copes with the breach of conflict law, saying "if you do [attack friendlies or civilians] with friendly troops around, they will attack you.". If you'd like to support our work with a donation, see here or choose Paypal or Patreon. If I think too hard on how this level of insanity and/or sheer stupidity came about I'm going to bust my brain. It involves using at least one more brain cell, and that's always a good thing. Gamers should be rewarded for respecting the law of armed conflict and there should be virtual penalties for serious violations of the law of armed conflict, in other words war crimes. The ICRC is suggesting that as in real life, these games should include virtual consequences for people's actions and decisions. And if a person can not make the difference between reality and a game then they need help from a psychiatrist and as such would not be able to be held accountable for the "War crimes" they did in a game. The International Committee of the Red Cross has confirmed that it won't prosecute gamers for participating in pretend war crimes, but that doesn't mean it wants to leave the topic alone.
should gamers be accountable for ingame war crimes